www.fmath.info

Norman attended school in Dayton and he was such an outstanding pupil that he was able to complete the twelve school years in only nine. At this stage he was only fifteen years old and so before entering university he worked for two years as a tool designer. This was not an arbitrary occupation to put off two years, rather it was his elder brother's trade and Norman had been taught the job by his brother. The job had a very positive effect on Steenrod's finances too, for it gave him the extra cash needed to pay his university expenses.

In 1927 Steenrod enrolled at the University of Miami at Oxford, Ohio. From there he moved to the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor where he attended courses in physics, philosophy and economics. He took just one mathematics course but it was an important one for the future direction of his research, for he took a topology course given by Raymond Wilder who had been a student of Robert Moore .

Steenrod graduated from Ann Arbor in 1932 but did not obtain a fellowship to allow him to undertake research. He spent the year 1932-33 back at his home in Dayton. He worked hard on topology problems which Wilder had given him and he made sufficient progress, despite working on his own, that by the end of the year he had written his first paper. Then things got better for Steenrod, for the quality of the paper led quickly to offers of fellowships from Harvard, Princeton and Duke. Again he decided to make some money and before taking up the Harvard fellowship, the one he had decided to accept, so he worked at the Flint Chevrolet plant as a die designer using again the skills he had learnt from his brother.

Before he had completed his year at Harvard he was offered fellowships for the following year by both Harvard and Duke. Before he had made his decision about which to accept he received another offer, this time from the University of Michigan. He decided to accept this latter offer to work with Wilder . However he discovered that Wilder would not be at Michigan during that year since he had arranged to spend it at Princeton. Wilder and Lefschetz put a strong case to Princeton for them to offer Steenrod a fellowship but even after achieving this it still took all their powers of persuasion to convince Steenrod to take up the Princeton offer.

At Princeton Steenrod worked for his doctorate being supervised by Lefschetz . He took only two years before he was awarded his Ph.D. then continued to work at Princeton as an instructor. He married Carolyn Witter in 1938 and they had two children, a girl born in 1942 and a son in 1947. In 1939 Steenrod accepted an appointment to the University of Chicago where he worked for three years, returning to the University of Michigan in 1942.

Steenrod spent five years back at Ann Arbor before accepting an offer from Princeton. He moved to Princeton in 1947 and remained on the Faculty there for the rest of his career.

After his first research work on point-set topology Steenrod then worked on algebraic topology. He is best known for introducing the Steenrod algebra which came about through his work in classifying by homotopy the maps of a complex into a sphere. He published a paper of fundamental importance on this topic in 1942 in which Steenrod squares are introduced for the first time. Lectures which he gave on this topic at Princeton were written up by David Epstein and published as Cohomology operations in 1962.

One of the other major topics of Steenrod's research was fibre bundles. Again Steenrod published a book on the topic which has become a classic. The book The Topology of Fibre Bundles was published in 1951. Chern , reviewing the book, writes:

This is the first systematic account of fibre bundles, covering the development of the subject from its birth in 1935 until the most recent period. Most of the essential aspects are treated ... . The book presupposes little knowledge of algebraic topology from the reader. It is divided into three parts. Part I deals with the general theory. ... Perhaps the most important result is the covering homotopy theorem, which has many consequences. Part II is devoted to the homotopy theory of bundles. A clear and concise treatment of the homotopy groups is given, the first one in book form. As one of its most interesting applications, information is obtained on the topological properties of spheres. ... Part III treats the cohomology theory of bundles. ...

In 1957 Steenrod was given the honour of being asked to give the American Mathematical Society Colloquium lectures. Rather surprisingly although notes of the lectures circulated for many years they were not published until 1972, after Steenrod's death. The introduction to this book sets the scene:

The lectures gave an excellent introduction to a central problem of algebraic topology and its applications, namely the problem of extending continuous functions. In particular, they gave a clear account of some of Steenrod's more important contributions to the subject and covered, as well, the related work of several other mathematicians. Many advances have been made since 1957, but most of them were inspired by the ideas presented in these lectures. This paper is strongly recommended for anyone wanting an introduction to the subject.

Finally we mention the important work which Steenrod did on homology theories which appeared in the famous book Foundations of algebraic topology which he wrote with Samuel Eilenberg and was published in 1952. The authors promised to write a second volume of this work but it never came about.

Steenrod received many honours for his major contribution to topology, the most important of which was his election to the National Academy of Sciences .

James writes in :

Algebraic topology underwent a spectacular development in the years following the second world war. From a position of minor importance, as compared as compared with the traditional areas of analysis and algebra, its concepts came to exert a profound influence, and it is now commonplace that a mathematical problem is "solved" by reducing it to a homology-theoretic one. To a great extent the success of this development can be attributed to Steenrod's influence.

We noted above Steenrod's interest in music. His other interests outside mathematics included tennis, golf, chess and bridge.

Source:School of Mathematics and Statistics University of St Andrews, Scotland